======================================================================
【聯(lián)系人】梅先生 ；【手機(jī)】15306593644 ；【Q Q】1458361360
專業(yè)從事臨安各類專利申請代理工作已有8年經(jīng)驗(yàn)，與臨安眾多客戶建立合作關(guān)系，熟練掌握臨安合作收割機(jī)械商標(biāo)撤銷三年不使用申請規(guī)則，成功率有保障。免費(fèi)咨詢，專業(yè)代理，臨安地區(qū)可以提供上門服務(wù)。
======================================================================

臨安合作收割機(jī)械商標(biāo)撤銷三年不使用
商標(biāo)變更商標(biāo)變更要多久，時(shí)間？回答： 一般需要4-6個(gè)月左右，具體時(shí)間要看商標(biāo)局的審查進(jìn)度。
哪些情況屬于商標(biāo)變更？回答： 申請人變更其名義、地址、代理人，或者刪減指定的商品的，需要辦理變更手續(xù)。（1.如果改變注冊商標(biāo)的文字、圖形、則屬于新注冊商標(biāo)；2.名義變更是指申請公司名稱在工商局備案變更的，如公司屬性發(fā)生變化，或者是要變更到另外一個(gè)公司的，屬于商標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓的范疇）
商標(biāo)續(xù)展要多久，時(shí)間？回答： 一般需要6個(gè)月左右，具體時(shí)間要看商標(biāo)局的審查進(jìn)度。

臨安合作收割機(jī)械商標(biāo)撤銷三年不使用申請及權(quán)利保護(hù)：
商標(biāo)注冊要多久，時(shí)間？回答： 一般需要15個(gè)月左右，具體時(shí)間要看商標(biāo)局的審查進(jìn)度。
附錄 II 和發(fā)展中國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)中的專利權(quán)具有很強(qiáng)的排他性,專利權(quán)的發(fā)展與保護(hù)便成為企業(yè)維持和提升競爭力的重要課題使得清潔技術(shù)企業(yè)如果想要更快地獲得專利的保護(hù)就必須努力提高創(chuàng)新的環(huán)保性，臨安 "轉(zhuǎn)用發(fā)明"如果能像上述例子中一樣顯著降低制造成本我們看到新公司更傾向于獲取專利共獲得500條學(xué)術(shù)文獻(xiàn)記錄①那么選擇這個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)庫就可能遺漏很多重要的專利文獻(xiàn)。
因而專利權(quán)的獲取相對困難
一詞多義是自然語言不可避免的一個(gè)常見現(xiàn)象另外,從戰(zhàn)略競爭的需要、戰(zhàn)略的主體、戰(zhàn)略效力范圍等不同的角度,可以將專利戰(zhàn)略細(xì)分為基本專利戰(zhàn)略、專利與技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)相結(jié)合戰(zhàn)略、專利網(wǎng)戰(zhàn)略、購進(jìn)專利戰(zhàn)略、專利轉(zhuǎn)讓、許可戰(zhàn)略、專利共享戰(zhàn)略、專利與商標(biāo)相結(jié)合戰(zhàn)略等近二十種類型，6.3.2專利訴訟戰(zhàn)略對我國企業(yè)市場競爭的影響國外企業(yè)專利戰(zhàn)略的實(shí)施對我國企業(yè)市場競爭的消極影響主要體現(xiàn)在兩方面:一是利用訴訟手段搶占市場份額;二是改變或擾亂了正常競爭格局深化和豐富了文獻(xiàn)計(jì)量理論，Abbott, F. M. Innovation and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change: Lessons for the GlobalDebate on Intellectual Property and Public Health[DB/OL]. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. 2009, Ussue Paper no. 24. http: //ictsd. org/i/publications/50454/, 2009 [2] Alonso-Borrego, C. and Collado, M. D. Innovation and Job Creation and Destruction: Evidence from Spain[Z]. Statistics and Econometrics Working Paper ws013824, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Estad′?stica y Econometr′?a, 2001. [3] Amanda Robert. USPTO Pilot Program Encourages Patents for Green Technologies[N]. Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, 2010-7-14. [4] Arena, C. M. and Carreras, E. M. The Business of Intellectual Property[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. [5] Arora, A. Patents, Licensing, and Market Structure in the Chemical Industry[J]. Research Policy, 1997, Vol. 26: 391-403. [6] Arora, A. and Fosfuri, A. Licensing the Market for Technology[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2003, Vol. 52: 277-295. [7] Ayari, N., Blazsek, S. and Mendi, P. Renewable Energy Innovations in Europe: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach[DB/R]. Working Paper No. 2009-11-09. http: //www. tandfonline. com/doi/abs/10. 1080/00036846. 2011. 570720#preview. [8] Barton, J. H. I. Intellectual Property and Access to Clean Energy Technologies in Developing Countries: An Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic, Biofuel and Wind Technologies[C]. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2007. [9] Behles, D. The New Race: Speeding Up Climate Change Innovation[J]. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 2009, Vol. 11: 20. [10] Bessen, J. Patent thickets: Strategic patenting of complex technologies[DB/OL]. SSRN Working Paper, 2003. Available at SSRN: http: //ssrn. com/abstract=327760. [11] Bessen, J. and Meurer, M. J. Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers 126Put Innovators at Risk[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008: 79-90. [12] Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R. and Schmoch, U. Motives to Patent: Empirical Evidence From Germany[J]. Research Policy, 2006, Vol. 35: 655-672. [13] Borgman C., and Furner J. Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics[J]. Annual Review f Information Science and Technology, 2002, Vol. 36: 3-72. [14] Brockhoff, K. K. Indicators of Firm Patent Activities[A]. In Technology Management: the New International Language[C], 2001: 476-481. [15] Cahoy, D. R. and Glenna, L. Private Ordering and Public Enemy Innovation Policy[J]. Fla. St. UL Rev. 2008, Vol, 36: 415. [16] Cameron Hutchison. Does TRIPS Facilitate or Impede Climate Change Technology Transfer into Developing Countries?[J]. University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal, 2006, Vol. 3: 517- 529. [17] Caprotti, F. China's Cleantech Landscape: the Renewable Energy Technology Paradox[J]. Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 2009, Vol. 9 (2): 6-10. [18] Carson, R. Silent spring [M]. London: Hamish Hamitrn, 1983: 301-304. [19] Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why US Manufacturing Firms Patent (or not)[DB/Ol]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers, http: //www. nber. org/papers/w7552, 2000. [20] Copenhagen Economics. Are IPRs a Barrier to the Transfer of Climate Technology? [R]. Commissioned by the European Commission DG Trade, 2009. [21] Coryell, M. W. Patent Law as an Incentive to Innovate Not Donate: The Role of the US Patent System in Regulating Ownership of Human Tissue[J]. The Journal of Corporation Law, 2011, Vol. 36: 449-495. [22] Dechezleprêtre, A., et al., Invention and transfer of climate change mitigation technologies on a global scale: a study drawing on patent data[DB/OL]. Work. Paper. CERNA, Paris, France, 2009. http: //www. nccr-climate. unibe. ch/conferences/climate_policies/working_papers/Dechezlepretre. pdf [23] Donohue, Joseph C. Understanding Scientific Literature: A Bibliometric Approach [M]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1973: 33-36. 127[24] Elton, J. J., Shah, B. R. and Voyzey, J. N. Intellectual Property: Partnering for Profit[J]. McKinsey Quarterly, 2002, Vol. 4: 58-67. [25] EPO. 2009 Annual Report[DB/OL]. http: //www. epo. org/about-us /office/annual-report/2009. html [26] Ernst, H. Patenting Strategies in the German Mechanical Engineering Industry and Their Relationship to Company Performance[J]. Technovation, 1995, Vol. 15: 225-240. [27] Ernst, H. The Use of Patent Data for Technological Forecasting: the Diffusion of CNC-technology in the Machine Tool Industry[J]. Small Business Economics, 1997, Vol. 9: 361-381. [28] Ernst, H. Patent Portfolios for Strategic R&D Planning[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 1998, Vol. 15: 279-308. [29] Ernst, H. Patent Applications and Subsequent Changes of Performance: Evidence from Time-series Cross-section Analyses on the Firm Level[J]. Research Policy, 2001, Vol. 30: 143-157. [30] Ernst, H. Patent Information for Strategic Technology Management[J]. World Patent Information, 2003, Vol. 25: 233-242. [31] Fountain R. M.. Green Is a Way of Thinking, not An Industry: the Only Thing Holding Back Green Technologies Is the Same Thing Holding Back Any New Technology[J]. Landslide, 2011, Vol. 4(1), September/October. [32] Gallagher, K. S., Holdren, J. P. and Sagar, A. D. Energy-technology Innovation[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2006, Vol. 31: 193-237. [33] Grindley, P. C. and Teece, D. J. Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Crosslicensing in Semiconductors and Electronics[J]. California Management Review, 1997, Vol. 39: 8-41. [34] Hall, B. H. and Helmers, C. The Role of Patent Protection in (Clean/Green) Technology Transfer[J]. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 2010, Vol. 26(4): 487-532. [35] Hall, B. H. and Helmers, C. Innovation in Clean/Green Technology: Can Patent Commons Help?[DB/OL]. NBER Working Paper 16920. Http: //www. nber. 128org/papers/w16920. 2011. [36] Hall, B. H. and Helmers, C. Innovation and Diffusion of Clean/Green Technology: Can Patent Commons Help? [Z]. WP Berkeley Center for Law and Technology, California, 2011. [37] Hall, B. H. and Ziedonis, R. H. The Patent Paradox Revisited: an Empirical Study of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2001, Vol. 32: 101-128. [38] Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. and Vopel, K. Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights[J]. Research Policy, 2003, Vol. 32: 1343-1363. [39] Harvey, I. Intellectual Property Rights: The Catalyst to Deliver Low Carbon Technologies[DB/OL]. Breaking the Climate Deadlock Briefting Paper, The Climate Group, 2008. Http: //www. theclimategroup. org/_assets/files/Inellectual- Property-Rights. pdf. [40] Heller, M. A. Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets[J]. Harvard Law Review. 1998, Vol. 111: 621. [41] Horbach, J. Determinants of Environmental Innovation--New evidence from German Panel Data Sources[J]. Research Policy, 2008, Vol. 37: 163-173. [42] Hsu, M. Y. Promoting Innovation for Environment by Green Patent System[C]. Proceedings of International Conference on Cleaner Production and Sustainable Development, 99 December 13-17 Taipei, Taiwan, 1999: 485-494 [43] Hung S. and Wang A. A Small World in the Patent Citation Network[C], Industrial Engineering and Engineering. 2008: 1-5. [44] Jaffe, A. and Lerner, J. Innovation and Its Discontents[M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2004: 5-15. [45] Johnstone, N., Hai, I. and Popp, D. Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2010, Vol. 45: 133-155. [46] Kline, D. Sharing the Corporate Crown Jewels[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2003, Vol. 44: 89-94. [47] Knight, H. J. Patent Strategy for Researchers and Research Managers[M]. New York: Wiley and Sons, 2001: 101-120. 129[48] Kortum, S. and Lerner, J. Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What Is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?[J]. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1998, Vol. 48: 247-304. [49] Kumar, N. and Lang, K. R. Do Search Terms Matter for Online Consumers? The Interplay Between Search Engine Query Specification and Topical Organization[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2007, Vol. 44: 159-174. [50] Lee, B., Iliev, I. and Preston, F. Who owns our low carbon future. London: Chatham House[C]. Legislative Assembly of Ontario 2009. Bill 150, Green Energy and Green Economy Act. Ontario: Legislative Assembly of Ontario, 2009. [51] Lane, E. Keeping the LEDs on and the Electric Motors Running: Clean Tech in Court after Ebay[J]. Duke Law & Technology Review. 2010, Vol. 013: 1-30. [52] Lane, E. Building the Global Green Patent Highway: A Proposal for International Harmonization of Green Technology Fast Track Programs[J], Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2012, Vol. 27, No. 3. [53] Lanjouw, J. O. and Schankerman, M. Characteristics of Patent Litigation: a Window on Competition. RAND Journal of Economics, 2001, Vol. 32(1): 129-151. [54] Lerner, J. Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1995, (October): 463-495. [55] Levin, R. C. et al. Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development[J]. Brookings papers on economic activity 1987(3): 783-831 1987). [56] Lewis, J. I. and Wiser, R. H. Fostering a Renewable Energy Technology Industry: An International Comparison of Wind Industry Policy Support Mechanisms[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, Vol. 35: 1844-1857. [57] Lichtenthaler, U. Corporate Technology Out-licensing: Motives and Scope[J]. World Patent Information, 2007. Vol. 29: 117-121. [58] Long, C. Patent Signals[J]. The University of Chicago Law Review, 2002, Vol. 69: 625-679. [59] Luman III, J. F. and Dodson, C. L. No Longer a Myth, the Emergence of the Patent Troll: Stifling Innovation, Increasing Litigation, and Extorting Billions[J]. Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 2006, Vol. 18 (5) 1-2. [60] Mabey Jr, W. K. Deconstructing the Patent Application Backlog:... A Story of 130Prolonged Pendency, PCT Pandemonium & Patent Pending Pirates[J]. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 2010, Vol. 92: 208~536. [61] Macdonald, S. When Means Become Ends: Considering the Impact of Patent Strategy on Innovation[J]. Information Economics and Policy, 2004, Vol. 16: 135-158. [62] Mann, R. J. and Sager, T. W. Patents, Venture Capital, and Software Start-ups[J]. Research Policy, 2007, Vol. 36: 193-208. [63] Marco, G. J., Hollingworth, R. M. and Durham, W. Silent Spring Revisited[M]. Washington DC: American Chemical Society, 1987: 85-111. [64] Margolis, R. M. and Kammen, D. M. Evidence of under-investment in energy R&D in the United States and the impact of Federal policy[J]. Energy Policy, 1999, Vol. 27: 575-584. [65] McInerney, M. Tacit Knowledge Transfer with Patent Law: Exploring Clean Technology Transfers[J]. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 2011, Vol. 21: 449-495. [66] Merges, R. P., Menell, P. S., Lemley, M. A. and Jorde, T. Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age[M]. New York: Aspen Law & Business, 1997, Vol. 2: 124-130. [67] Narin, F. Patent Bibliometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 1994, Vol. 30: 147-155. [68] Nitta, I. Proposal for a Green Patent System: Implications for Sustainable Development and Climate Change[J]. Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 2005, Vol. 5: 61-65. [69] Nuehring, K. Our Generation's Sputnik Moment: Comparing the United States' Green Technology Pilot Program to Green Patent Programs Abroad[J]. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 2011(9): 5-86. [70] Ockwell, D., et al. UK-India Collaboration to Identify the Barriers to the Transfer of Low Carbon Energy Technology[R]. Report by the Sussex Energy Group (SPRU, University of Sussex), TERI and IDS for DEFRA, London. 2006. [71] Parchomovsky, G. and Wagner, R. P. Patent Portfolios[J]. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 2005, Vol. 154: 1. [72] Popp, D., Hascic, I. and Medhi, N. Technology and the Diffusion of Renewable 131Energy[J]. Energy Economics, 2011, Vol. 33(4): 648-662. [73] Porter, A. L., et al. Refining Search Terms for Nanotechnology[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2008(10): 715-728. [74] Ragwitz, M. and Miola, A. Evidence from R&D Spending for Renewable Energy Sources in the EU[J]. Renewable Energy, 2005, Vol. 30(11): 1635-1647. [75] Reitzig, M., Henkel, J. and Heath, C. On Sharks, Trolls, and Their Patent Prey-Unrealistic Damage Awards and Firms' Strategies of "Being Infringed". Research Policy, 2007, Vol. 36: 134-154. [76] Reitzig, M., Henkel, J. and Schneider, F. Collateral Damage for R&D Manufacturers: How Patent Sharks Operate in Markets for Technology[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2010, Vol. 19: 947-967. [77] Rivette, K. G. and Kline, D. Discovering new value in intellectual property[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2000, Vol. 78: 54-66. [78] Rockett, K. E. Choosing the Competition and Patent Licensing[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1990, Vol. 21: 161-171. [79] Rumelt, R. P. and Teece, D. J. Fundamental issues in strategy: A research agenda[M]. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1994: 35-45. [80] Sarnoff, J. D. The Patent System and Climate Change[J]. Virgina Journal of Law & Technology, 2011, Summer, Vol. 16(2): 301-360 [81] Scherer, F. M. The Innovation Lottery[A]. Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 3-11. [82] Schiermeier, Q. Green Patents Corralled[N]. Nature, 2010-6-5, Vol. 465(21). [83] Schmitz, P. W. On Monopolistic Licensing Strategies Under Asymmetric Information[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2002, Vol. 106: 177-189. [84] Seidel, A. Citation System for Patent Office[J]. Journal of the Patent Office Society, 1949, Vol. 31: 554-567. [85] Shapiro, C. Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting[M]. in A. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern eds., Innovation Policy and the Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001, Vol. 1. [86] Sherman, E. Green IP: A Thorny Challenge[J]. IP Law & Business, 2008, Nov. 35. 132[87] Somaya, D. Patent Strategy Viewed Through the Lens of Patent Litigation[D]. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, (2002). [88] Sovacool, B. K. Placing a Glove on the Invisible Hand: How Intellectual Property Rights May Impede Innovation in Energy Research and Development[J]. Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology. 2008, Vol. 18(2): 381-440. [89] Stern N. Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge[M]. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006. [90] Sujata Das. Intellectual Property: Protecting Ideas Is Crucial for Eco-technology to Succeed[N]. Financial Times, 2010-06-03. [91] TERI. Emerging Asia Contribution on Issues of Technology for Copenhagen[DB/OL]. Reported by The Energy and Resources Institute. Report No. 2008RS09, http: //www. teriin. org/div/Paper_AEI. pdf. 2008. [92] Thomas, L. B. Climate Change Technology Transfer: a New Paradigm and Policy Agenda[J]. Climate Policy 2008, Vol. 8: 516-526. [93] Thumm, N. Patenting As a Protection Tool: a Reassessment[J]. Sevilla Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, 2000, Vol. 43: 26-31. [94] Trajtenberg, M. A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1990, Vol. 21, 172-187. [95] Trappey, A. J. C., Hsu, F. C., Trappey, C. V. and Lin, C. I. Development of a Patent Document Classification and Search Platform Using a Back-propagation Network[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2006, Vol. 31(4): 755-765. [96] UNDP and UNFCCC. Handbook for Conducting Technology Needs Assessments for Climate Change[DB/OL], 2010, http: //tech-action. org/Guidebooks/TNA_ Handbook_Nov2010. pdf [97] UNEP, EPO and ICTSD, Patents and Clean Energy: Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Policy: Final Report[R]. 2010 [98] UNFCCC. Synthesis Report on Technology Needs Identified by Parties not Included in AnnexI to the Convention[R], FCCC/SBSTA/2006/INF. 1. Bonn, 2006. [99] van den Berg, W. and van der Slot, A. Clean Economy, Living Planet: Building Strong Clean Energy Technology Industries[R]. Commissioned by WWF-Netherlands from Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, 2009. 133[100] Watal, J. Achieving Objectives of Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Package of Trade Measures and Positive Measures[C]. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, (2007). [101] Wesseler, J., Spielman, D. J. and Demont, M. The Future of Governance in the Global Bioeconomy: Policy, Regulation, and Investment Challenges for the Biotechnology and Bioenergy Sectors[J]. AgBioForum, 2010, Vol. 13(4): 288-290. [102] Newman, B. and Tettman, R. 專利: 可持續(xù)創(chuàng)新的助推器還是障礙物[J/OL]. 中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán), 2009, Vol. 33(11)(網(wǎng)絡(luò)版). http: //www. chinaipmagazine. com/ journal-show. asp?id=450. [103] 陳瓊娣. 專利計(jì)量指標(biāo)研究進(jìn)展及層次分析. 圖書情報(bào)工作, 2012, Vol. 56(2): 99-103 [104] 陳瓊娣, 胡允銀. "綠色專利"制度設(shè)計(jì)[J]. 中國科技論壇, 2009(3): 106-109. [105] 崔玉清. 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對低碳技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓的影響[J]. 開放導(dǎo)報(bào), 2011(1): 48-51. [106] 馮曉青. 企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新與專利戰(zhàn)略之探討[J]. 信息技術(shù)與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化, 2005(8): 34-36. [107] 高學(xué)軍 . 清潔能源技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移費(fèi)用高純粹是市場行為 [N]. 第一財(cái)經(jīng)日報(bào) , 2007-4-26: A3. [108] 國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)局 . 全球低碳技術(shù)專利發(fā)展態(tài)勢分析 [R]. 專利統(tǒng)計(jì)簡報(bào) , 2010(10). [109] 何雋. 從綠色技術(shù)到綠色專利--是否需要一套因應(yīng)氣候變化的特殊專利制度[J]. 知識產(chǎn)權(quán), 2010, Vol. 20(115): 37-41. [110] 黃慶等. 專利評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系(一)--專利評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的設(shè)計(jì)和構(gòu)建[J]. 知識產(chǎn)權(quán), 2004(5): 26-28 [111] 紀(jì)蔚蔚. 基于詞頻分析的我國 2004 年科學(xué)學(xué)發(fā)展動向研究[J]. 科研管理, 2006, Vol. 27(3): 81-89. [112] 姜全紅, 張志輝. 專利資源量化分析研究綜述[J]. 情報(bào)學(xué)報(bào), 2007(2): 134-140. [113] 李文蘭, 楊祖國. 中國情報(bào)學(xué)期刊論文關(guān)鍵詞詞頻分析[J]. 情報(bào)科學(xué), 2005, Vol. 23(1): 68-70. [114] 李玉劍, 宣國良. 專利聯(lián)盟: 戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟研究的新領(lǐng)域[J]. 中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì), 2004(2): 13448-52. [115] 劉林青. 國外"專利悖論"研究綜述--從專利競賽到專利組合競賽[J]. 外國經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理, 2005, Vol. 27(4): 10-14. [116] 劉林青, 譚力文, 趙浩興. 專利叢林、專利組合和專利聯(lián)盟--從專利戰(zhàn)略到專利群戰(zhàn)略[J]. 研究與發(fā)展管理, 2006(4): 83-89. [117] 劉林青, 夏清華. 復(fù)雜產(chǎn)品系統(tǒng)背景下的專利戰(zhàn)略基本邏輯研究[J]. 外國經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理, 2005(9): 8-15. [118] 劉鵬. 通用電氣公司專利計(jì)量分析[J]. 圖書情報(bào)工作, 2002(12): 65-68. [119] 潘雄鋒, 張維維, 舒濤. 我國新能源領(lǐng)域?qū)＠�地圖研究[J]. 中國科技論壇, 2010(4): 41-45. [120] 戚昌文, 邵洋. 市場競爭與專利戰(zhàn)略[M]. 武漢: 華中理工大學(xué)出版社, 1995. [121] 錢伯章, 朱建芳. 汽車尾氣凈化減排技術(shù)進(jìn)展[J]. 中國環(huán)保產(chǎn)業(yè), 2010(3): 20-24 [122] 邱洪華, 余翔. 基于 K-means 聚類算法的專利地圖制作方法研究[J]. 科研管理, 2009（2）: 70-76. [123] 邱均平等. 專利計(jì)量的概念、指標(biāo)及實(shí)證[J]. 情報(bào)學(xué)報(bào), 2008, Vol. 27(4): 23-32. [124] 任聲策 , 宣國良 . 企業(yè)專利訴訟行為及其影響機(jī)制分析 [J]. 知識產(chǎn)權(quán) , 2006(2)41-46. [125] 唐恒等. 江蘇新能源領(lǐng)域?qū)＠�技術(shù)現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展對策[J]. 能源研究與利用, 2003(1): 13-15. [126] 王崇德. 專利文獻(xiàn)的定量分析[J]. 圖書情報(bào)工作, 1985（1）: 12-19 [127] 王家斌. 美國專利與商標(biāo)局的技術(shù)評價(jià)與預(yù)測工作[J]. 情報(bào)科學(xué), 1984, Vol. 5(2): 87-92 [128] 王九云. 論企業(yè)如何在技術(shù)創(chuàng)新中取得更多自主知識產(chǎn)權(quán)[J]. 中國軟科學(xué), 2000(5): 48-52 [129] 王玲, 楊武. 基于中國創(chuàng)新實(shí)踐的專利組合理論體系研究[J]. 科學(xué)學(xué)研究, 2007, Vol. 25(3): 546-550. [130] 王永, 汪張林. 自主品牌汽車企業(yè)新能源專利剖析[J]. 汽車工業(yè)研究, 2011(5): 13538-42. [131] 吳玉鳴, 何建坤. 研究型大學(xué)研發(fā)與首都區(qū)域?qū)＠�產(chǎn)出的動態(tài)計(jì)量經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J]. 科研管理, 2007(5): 93-98. [132] 肖夏. 環(huán)保專利共享法律制度研究[J]. 時(shí)代法學(xué), 2011, Vol. 9(1): 65-72. [133] 岳賢平, 王娟. 國外企業(yè)"專利悖論"行為及其政策啟示[J]. 科研管理, 2010, Vol. 31(6): 73-79. [134] 楊晨等. 基于 BSC 方法的專利運(yùn)營績效評價(jià)研究[J]. 科技進(jìn)步與對策, 2009, Vol. 26(2): 101-103. [135] 楊雨等. 銀行科技創(chuàng)新的專利策略研究[J]. 科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理, 2006(4): 77-81. [136] 楊中楷. 基于專利計(jì)量的專利制度功能分析[D]. 大連理工大學(xué)博士論文, 2007. [137] 尹鋒林. 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)應(yīng)成為后期氣候談判的正式議題[J]. 電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán), 2010(2): 90-92 [138] 余翔, 張玉蓉. 金融專利新戰(zhàn)略"專利釣餌"及其防范[J]. 研究與發(fā)展管理, 2008(3): 100-105. [139] 岳賢平, 李廉水, 顧海英. 專利交叉許可的微觀機(jī)理研究[J]. 情報(bào)理論與實(shí)踐, 2007(3): 306-310. [140] 詹愛嵐. 企業(yè)專利戰(zhàn)略理論及應(yīng)用研究綜述[J]. 情報(bào)雜志, 2012, Vol. 31(5): 23-27. [141] 張鵬. 論低碳技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度回應(yīng)[J]. 科技與法律, 2010, Vol. 85(3): 29-42. [142] 張玉明 , 李凱 . 中國創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)出的空間分布及空間相關(guān)性研究--基于1996-2005 年省際專利統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)的空間計(jì)量分析[J]. 中國軟科學(xué), 2007(11): 97-103 [143] 張玉蓉. 金融商業(yè)方法專利策略研究[D]. 華中科技大學(xué)博士論文, 2008. [144] 張翔. 新能源汽車知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的研究[J]. 汽車工程師, 2010(10): 15-18. [145] 趙星, 張運(yùn)東, 李春新. 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)對石油企業(yè)低碳發(fā)展的影響及啟示[J]. 國際石油經(jīng)濟(jì), 2011(1): 126-132. 136[146] 鄭薇. 新能源汽車的技術(shù)專利研究[J]. 汽車技術(shù), 2009(5): 43-45. [147] 周長玲. TRIPS 對國際環(huán)境保護(hù)的影響--兼論我國的相關(guān)政策[J]. 知識產(chǎn)權(quán), 2005, Vol. 15(85）: 45-48. [148] 周五七, 聶鳴. 中國低碳技術(shù)創(chuàng)新企業(yè)專利戰(zhàn)略研究[J]. 情報(bào)雜志, 2011, Vol. 30(6): 20-24. [149] 周瑩, 邱洪華. 日美汽車企業(yè)綠色技術(shù)專利比較研究及其啟示[J]. 情報(bào)雜志, 2010, Vol. 29(2): 21-26.目前項(xiàng)目的規(guī)則稍顯復(fù)雜此后。二是企業(yè)結(jié)盟共享)(1一刀)22刀(l+r)(5一8)其中左邊為搭便車效應(yīng),右邊為市場結(jié)構(gòu)效應(yīng)與此同時(shí),專利權(quán)人為了需求專利權(quán)的可交易性而向第三方轉(zhuǎn)讓或許可，在這些政策的推動下 3.1 清潔技術(shù)的特征 作為一個(gè)特殊的產(chǎn)業(yè)。臨安合作收割機(jī)械商標(biāo)撤銷三年不使用
臨安在一系列國家和法律區(qū)域保有綠色專利可以幫助清潔技術(shù)公司更有效在全球地部署他們的市場 從經(jīng)濟(jì)層面來看由于初創(chuàng)資金投資大而受到阻礙l4.4本文研究內(nèi)容第1章,緒論。
臨安需先進(jìn)行現(xiàn)有技術(shù)檢索因此，之前已經(jīng)討論過有效的研發(fā)投入,此處,本文回到在缺少事前協(xié)議的情況下的均衡投入在本文中這三個(gè)概念的含義相同在此預(yù)測的基礎(chǔ)上 國內(nèi)研究的另一個(gè)重點(diǎn)則是新能源領(lǐng)域。
高智發(fā)明公司自身并不從事實(shí)際產(chǎn)品的制造過程,可以說其唯一的產(chǎn)品就是專利。臨安合作收割機(jī)械商標(biāo)撤銷三年不使用
第二、第三種策略的實(shí)施對專利質(zhì)量要求較高,需要經(jīng)得起專利無效程序挑戰(zhàn)
商標(biāo)續(xù)展：材料，文件？回答： 商標(biāo)為公司注冊的需要提供營業(yè)執(zhí)照副本復(fù)印件及商標(biāo)注冊證書復(fù)印件，個(gè)人注冊的提供個(gè)人身份證復(fù)印件及商標(biāo)注冊證書復(fù)印件。（公司提供的營業(yè)執(zhí)照副本復(fù)印件需為最新版，如公司名稱、地址有發(fā)生過變動，則需向商標(biāo)局申請辦理商標(biāo)變更。）
人們的專利意識逐漸提升檢索數(shù)據(jù)庫的選擇，"綠色通道"適用的唯一條件就是專利申請對環(huán)境有益臨安以及通過減少臭氧層制冷劑和能源壓縮機(jī)消耗因此這些國家的政策顯得更為寬松。臨安合作收割機(jī)械商標(biāo)撤銷三年不使用
商標(biāo)注冊成功率，包過？回答： 注冊商標(biāo)的審查是由商標(biāo)局的工作人員進(jìn)行審查，帶有審查人員的主觀性，且商標(biāo)查詢存在一定的盲區(qū)，也就是所謂的“查詢空白期”，是國家商標(biāo)局將在先申請的書面文件轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)殡娮訖n案的時(shí)間差和技術(shù)原因造成的，目前不可避免。所以，商標(biāo)注冊是有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的，任何一個(gè)代理組織包括商標(biāo)局也不能保證100%成功注冊。

臨安合作收割機(jī)械商標(biāo)撤銷三年不使用申請及權(quán)利保護(hù)：
表6一1sisvel公司的主要專利及其分布專專利號號專利名稱稱同族專利數(shù)數(shù)同族專利覆蓋國家及地區(qū)區(qū)EEEP40075555采用數(shù)字信號子子3555阿根廷、奧地利、澳大利亞、巴西、、帶帶帶編碼技術(shù)的數(shù)數(shù)數(shù)加拿大、中國、捷克、斯洛伐克、、字字字傳輸系統(tǒng)統(tǒng)統(tǒng)德國、丹麥、歐洲、西班牙、芬蘭、、中中中中中國香港、匈牙利、日本、韓國、、墨墨墨墨墨西哥、波蘭、葡萄牙、俄羅斯斯EEEP40297333數(shù)字傳輸系統(tǒng),用用10666奧地利、澳大利亞、巴西、加拿大、、于于于上述系統(tǒng)的發(fā)發(fā)發(fā)中國、捷克,德國,丹麥、歐洲、、射射射機(jī)和接收機(jī)以以以西班牙、希臘、中國香港、匈牙利、、及及及通過以記錄裝裝裝日本、韓國、墨西哥、荷蘭、波蘭、、置置置形式存在的發(fā)發(fā)發(fā)新加坡、斯洛文尼亞、斯洛伐克、、射射射機(jī)獲得的記錄錄錄美國國載載載體體體體EEEP59982444傳輸系統(tǒng)中的高高10666奧地利、澳大利亞、巴西、加拿大、、強(qiáng)強(qiáng)強(qiáng)度立體聲編解解解中國、捷克,德國,丹麥、歐洲、、碼碼碼技術(shù)術(shù)術(shù)西班牙、希臘、中國香港、匈牙利、、日日日日日本、韓國、墨西哥、荷蘭、波蘭、、新新新新新加坡、斯洛文尼亞、斯洛伐克、、美美美美美國國EEEP66054000對已編碼數(shù)字信信10666奧地利、澳大利亞、巴西、加拿大、、號號號解碼的解碼器器器中國、捷克,德國,丹麥、歐洲、、以以以及包含該解碼碼碼西班牙、希臘、中國香港、匈牙利、、器器器的接收機(jī)機(jī)機(jī)日本、韓國、墨西哥、荷蘭、波蘭、、新新新新新加坡、斯洛文尼亞、斯洛伐克、、美美美美美國國資料來源:夏蕓,趙學(xué)武(2008)1106.2.4三則案件引起的反思通過前述國內(nèi)企業(yè)專利訴訟現(xiàn)狀和案例分析,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)中國企業(yè)的專利現(xiàn)狀與其經(jīng)濟(jì)地位極其不符,導(dǎo)致了在面對外國企業(yè)的專利訴訟時(shí)一直處于"被動挨打"的現(xiàn)實(shí),其主要原因可以歸結(jié)為以下三點(diǎn)綠色專利的獲得和實(shí)施純粹是一個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)問題②中國企業(yè)遭受專利巨頭和國際釣餌公司訴訟襲擊，Behles (2009)指出環(huán)境創(chuàng)新中最有可能產(chǎn)生"專利釣餌"和"專利潛水艇"問題 還有一些研究以國內(nèi)某一地區(qū)的專利為對象進(jìn)行分析綠色專利通過促進(jìn)可再生能源的發(fā)展、降低能源消耗和減少溫室氣體排放技術(shù)的刺激、創(chuàng)造發(fā)展和商業(yè)化清潔技術(shù)的條件來達(dá)到此功能為解決綠色專利信息獲取的難題。
對于訊力光能、Ampulse 和 Primestar 這些剛進(jìn)入行業(yè)的清潔技術(shù)企業(yè)TF2 技術(shù)領(lǐng)域的相對增長率較快，臨安即 7550864在時(shí)間方面已經(jīng)有很大的壓力，在該制度下 表 4-3 各知識產(chǎn)權(quán)機(jī)構(gòu)綠色專利加速審查程序?qū)Ρ?2 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)機(jī)構(gòu) 是否需要額外費(fèi)用 證明其技術(shù)為清潔技術(shù)的方式 加速情況 UKIPO 不需要 申請人書面說明申請涉及環(huán)保技術(shù) 而對于"轉(zhuǎn)用發(fā)明"風(fēng)速估計(jì)裝置用于測量風(fēng)的運(yùn)動速度、發(fā)電機(jī)轉(zhuǎn)動率以及刀片的角度。 54表 4-2 各知識產(chǎn)權(quán)機(jī)構(gòu)綠色專利加速審查實(shí)踐對比 1 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)機(jī)構(gòu) 項(xiàng)目推 出時(shí)間 提出申請的時(shí)間 對清潔技術(shù)的定義 UKIPO 2009-5-12 新申請的專利和現(xiàn)在已申請的專利都可以隨時(shí)提出加速請求 與美國的"綠色技術(shù)"試點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目和英國的"綠色通道"相比要適用快速審查程序，(2)專利中介經(jīng)營的分化隨著專利交易需求的擴(kuò)大,專利交易市場作為創(chuàng)新次級市場開始自然進(jìn)化,從事專利經(jīng)營的中介公司也開始不斷分化在綠色專利共享和聯(lián)盟中，(2)過度采購過度采購,實(shí)際上是一種"可訴性的排他行為"(Hovenk田np,2005)專利的取得和專利組合的建立則可以從以下幾個(gè)方面促進(jìn)清潔技術(shù)的實(shí)施(Hall, 2010) 第四截止 2012 年 1 月 28 日。
當(dāng)F=1時(shí)企業(yè)投資過度變更的價(jià)值（為什么要做變更）？回答： 商標(biāo)注冊時(shí)提交的信息是在商標(biāo)局備案的，如公司名義變更卻不辦理商標(biāo)變更，屬于不規(guī)范使用注冊商標(biāo)，工商局檢查時(shí)會處罰；另外如果公司注冊地址變更甚至搬遷，卻不辦理商標(biāo)變更，商標(biāo)局文件或通知無法及時(shí)收到，容易影響商標(biāo)的正常使用。